
A collections attorney uses legal tools like UCC liens and litigation to recover funds efficiently for merchant cash advance funders facing defaults.
As an attorney representing merchant cash advance funding companies, precision in legal terminology is non-negotiable. One common point of confusion is the spelling of "judgment" versus "judgement." This article clarifies why "judgment" is the correct choice in US English. As a judgment attorney handling collections, lawsuits, litigation, and judgment enforcement, it's particularly important that we get it right.
In US English, "judgment" (without the "e") is the only correct spelling. In UK English, "judgement" with an "e" is typically used in everyday contexts, but "judgment" without the "e" becomes the preferred choice when it comes to legal matters. During my time in law school, I was taught to drop the "e" in "judgment" to adhere to standard American English, a practice I maintain to ensure precision in legal writing. This distinction is critical for maintaining professionalism, particularly for judgment attorneys!
Using "judgment" ensures clarity and professionalism in legal documents. Whether filing lawsuits, pursuing collections, or enforcing judgments for merchant cash advance funders, the correct spelling enhances credibility. Courts, clients, and opposing counsel expect precision, and a simple error like adding an "e" can undermine trust in written motions, contracts, or correspondence.
Here are examples of "judgment" in US English:
To maintain professionalism and avoid errors:
The spelling of "judgment" may seem minor, but for judgment attorneys in the US, it’s a detail that reflects expertise and attention to accuracy. By using "judgment" without the "e," you align with legal standards and build trust with clients and courts. At our firm, we apply this precision to every aspect of representing merchant cash advance funding companies, from collections and lawsuits to litigation and judgment enforcement. For expert legal support, contact a judgment attorney who gets the details right—because in law, every letter counts.
A collections attorney uses legal tools like UCC liens and litigation to recover funds efficiently for merchant cash advance funders facing defaults.
A collections attorney leverages UCC liens to help funders recover funds efficiently when merchants default on merchant cash advance agreements.
Judgment enforcement made simple: How a judgment attorney can help your merchant cash advance company collect on judgments fast.
Discover how merchant cash advance (MCA) funders can protect their investments from usury claims in New York by crafting contracts that legally distinguish them as purchases, not loans.
This post outlines legal tactics like bank levies that David I. Mizrahi Law, P.C. uses to help MCA funders recover funds in NYC.
Learn why merchants default on MCAs, spot warning signs, and discover prevention and recovery strategies from David I. Mizrahi Law, P.C. in Manhattan.
This post shares expert tips from David I. Mizrahi Law, P.C. for MCA funders to craft enforceable contracts that protect advances and ensure recovery in NYC’s tough market.
This post guides MCA funders on enforcing New York judgments, covering asset discovery and legal recovery tools with insights from David I. Mizrahi, Esq., in Manhattan.